• Home
  • Articles
  • Classic
  • DVD/Blu-ray
  • Theatrical
  • Trailers
  • TV
  • YouTube
  • Contact
So I saw this movie a while back but just didn’t have it in me to write about it. Why you ask? Well it just was really a waste of time.  Now granted it was tense, made me jump a couple times but only cause it was designed that way. Now its just to bad they didn’t design any story in to it.  OK, maybe I might be a little harsh on this movie but you expect more from the writers of Saw. Yeah, I know right? Now granted I didn’t know who was part of the writing and directing team when I started, but half way through the movie I couldn’t shake the feeling that this was just a weak version of Saw.

Man I hope I don't get killed when I rob your house tonight...
Man I hope I don't get killed when I rob your house tonight...

Now I am a fan of horror flicks, a big fan even. But I do like a little bit of information about the killer. Not a lot mind you, but something. I get that there are psychos out there but what are they going for, why does he collect. The only thing we know is that he collects people and watches a lot of Saw movies, oh and he isn’t squeamish around blood.  They gave us all kinds of back story on the main character Arkin (Josh Stewart) like why he would even think of robbing the house of his employer. What he didn’t know is that the killer apparently could stop time and set up 20 hours worth of elaborate traps in just a few short hours.  The movie is not shy on tension as there is a lot of cat and mouse action going on, and no shortage of blood, and even a “hot chick”. But that alone can not make a good movie in my opinion.  I just kept saying Why?? and How in the heck did he have time to set that up?, not to mention, screw the family man save yourself!! I mean you were going to rob them to begin with so what gives. Just stupid, there is one thing I did like about the movie though, * stop reading if you don’t want to be spoiled………. seriously stop.. I’m going to give away the ending.

I wish I could have watched the movie like this....
I wish I could have watched the movie like this....

The Collector won in the end. In a very bizarre and twisted turn of events.  Leading me to think that they may try to make a sequel. Dear god I hope not, save that money and go pick a new fresh script sitting under all the remake horror scripts on the table. At least then you have a chance of some originality.  Like I stated earlier, I may be a little hard on this movie, I should just take what it was suppose to be, a horror flick, but with it just left me feeling disappointed. It didn’t make any sense.  Oh well here is to hopping the next power on of the DVD player is more successful.

Did you see it? Did you like it? Or did I just not find the right frame of mind to watch it in.

"> Disclaimer: Yes, this is a real trailer for a real movie. No, it’s not April 1st.

Just when I thought I had seen it all, comes a movie about a killer tire. Just in case you missed that… A. KILLER. TIRE. And judging by the teaser trailer, it uses its’, um… mind?

So make that: A. TELEKENETIC. KILLER. TIRE.

Written and directed by Quentin Dupieux, who has also given us other one-word-titled-movies like Nonfilm and Steak, brings us the tale of a discarded tire that… does stuff. In fact, I don’t really know what’s going to happen in this film, so your guess is as good as mine.

I’m sure this film will roll our way sometime soon.

">Where it meets the road.
I really don’t know what to say about this movie.  Well, I don’t know what to say good about it. It was a very difficult movie to watch.  It is the most pointless, contrived drivel I’ve seen since Jumper.

(more…)

"> So here I go again, watching another remake. With this one, I think I can kind of see why they did it. The original was pretty much a B-cult film in 1974, (with two sequels), so why not try and update it?

Having never seen the original, I can’t make any comparisons, so I took this movie as its own beast. Although, I have heard that this remake is a remake in name only, not having anything to do with the original movie.

Within the first few minutes of the film, I was immediately put off by the lead actress. Bijou Phillips has one of the most annoying voices I have ever heard, and I really struggled to get past it. I never really did, so having her grating, flinty voice droning on every time she opened her mouth didn’t help much. Could someone also give this girl a sandwich?

That aside, this flick fits firmly into the ‘evil satanic murdering baby’ genre. It goes like this: pregnant college girl leaves school to have her baby, baby is evil, girl stays out of school, baby kills. Once the baby starts the killing, (outside of the hospital), the annoying voiced Mother does nothing to stop her Hellspawn. In fact, she covers up the bird and cat killings that first occur, and then later covers up the human killings without ever giving it much of a second thought. This bothered me, because they never showed us any kind of Mother/Baby bonding at all. It’s just that she instantly covers up the baby’s killing spree, and this baby kills all the time. Everyone and everything, completely indiscriminate. It’s just that they could have shown us some sort of connection between them, even if it began in the womb and the baby had some kind of ‘protect me’ spell on his host.

So halfway through the movie she’s disposing of bodies and the bodies’ cars and we really don’t know why she’d go to such lengths, aside from the fact that she’s ‘Its’ Mommy. Also, we have no idea why the baby is killing, aside from being hungry. I guess that should be good enough, (and why isn’t the baby sharing with his undernourished Mommy?). I guess we don’t really NEED a reason as to why the satanic baby is killing, but the plot summary/tagline for the movie states this:
“A baby born to a human couple turns out to be a mutant monster with an appetite to kill when scared.”
The problem is that the only time we see it ‘scared’ is in the hospital. Did the dude standing outside smoking a cigarette scare it? I think not. They should have had the plot summary be:
“Baby hungry, baby eat…flesh.”
Already I’ve made it more interesting.

So much about this movie just doesn’t add up. I like my B-horror as much as the next guy, with thin plots and cheesy effects, but those movies know what they are and what they are doing. This movie doesn’t know what it wants to be or how to get there.

It’s Alive. Yep, it sure is, but this movie is nothing but dead.

">

Tags

action adventure animation awesome bad movie bruce willis childrens comedy comic Corey Feldman Corey Haim cult danny trejo david lynch disney drama fantasy ghosts horror jason schwartzman justin kevin smith laurence fishburne michael cera mystery remake robert rodriguez romance scary Sci-Fi sequel series stupid teen thriller Top ten trailer TV twist vampire video game violent walton goggins youtube zombie

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Hulu
  • IMDB
  • TV.com
  • Youtube

Recent Comments

  • Megan on Spartacus: Blood and Sand
  • Justin on Tron Legacy: Literal Trailer
  • Justin on Resident Evil: Afterlife
  • Devon on Resident Evil: Afterlife
  • Bryan on Resident Evil: Afterlife
  • anonymous on Resident Evil: Afterlife
  • Cindy on Fight Club
  • Justin on The Collector

All content ©® 2010 The Viewing Screen, except where explicitly stated. All images ©® their respective owners.